On the Detection of Conflicts in Diagnostic Bayesian Networks Using Abstraction

Abstract

An important issue in the use of expert systems is the so-called brittleness problem. Expert systems model only a limited part of the world. While the explicit management of uncertainty in expert systems mitigates the brittleness problem, it is still possible for a system to be used, unwittingly, in ways that the system is not prepared to address. Such a situation may be detected by the method of straw models, first presented by Jensen et al. [1990] and later generalized and justified by Laskey [1991]. We describe an algorithm, which we have implemented, that takes as input an annotated diagnostic Bayesian network (the base model) and constructs, without assistance, a bipartite network to be used as a straw model. We show that in some cases this straw model is better that the independent straw model of Jensen et al., the only other straw model for which a construction algorithm has been designed and implemented.

Cite

Text

Kim and Valtorta. "On the Detection of Conflicts in Diagnostic Bayesian Networks Using Abstraction." Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1995.

Markdown

[Kim and Valtorta. "On the Detection of Conflicts in Diagnostic Bayesian Networks Using Abstraction." Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1995.](https://mlanthology.org/uai/1995/kim1995uai-detection/)

BibTeX

@inproceedings{kim1995uai-detection,
  title     = {{On the Detection of Conflicts in Diagnostic Bayesian Networks Using Abstraction}},
  author    = {Kim, Young-Gyun and Valtorta, Marco},
  booktitle = {Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence},
  year      = {1995},
  pages     = {362-367},
  url       = {https://mlanthology.org/uai/1995/kim1995uai-detection/}
}