Is There a Role for Qualitative Risk Assessment?

Abstract

Classically, risk is characterised by a point value probability indicating the likelihood of occurrence of an adverse effect. However, there are domains where the attainability of objective numerical risk characterisations is increasingly being questioned. This paper reviews the arguments in favour of extending classical techniques of risk assessment to incorporate meaningful qualitative and weak quantitative risk characterisations. A technique in which linguistic uncertainty terms are defined in terms of patterns of argument is then proposed. The technique is demonstrated using a prototype computer-based system for predicting the carcinogenic risk due to novel chemical compounds.

Cite

Text

Krause et al. "Is There a Role for Qualitative Risk Assessment?." Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1995.

Markdown

[Krause et al. "Is There a Role for Qualitative Risk Assessment?." Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1995.](https://mlanthology.org/uai/1995/krause1995uai-there/)

BibTeX

@inproceedings{krause1995uai-there,
  title     = {{Is There a Role for Qualitative Risk Assessment?}},
  author    = {Krause, Paul J. and Fox, John and Judson, Philip N.},
  booktitle = {Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence},
  year      = {1995},
  pages     = {386-393},
  url       = {https://mlanthology.org/uai/1995/krause1995uai-there/}
}