Independence with Lower and Upper Probabilities
Abstract
It is shown that the ability of the interval probability representation to capture epistemological independence is severely limited. Two events are epistemologically independent if knowledge of the first event does not alter belief (i.e., probability bounds) about the second. However, iudependence in this form can only exist in a 2-monotone probability function in degenerate cases -- i.e., if the prior bounds are either point probabilities or entirely vacuous. Additional limitations are characterized for other classes of lower probabilities as well. It is argued that these phenomena are a matter of interpretation. They appear to be limitations when one interprets probability bounds as a measure of epistemological indeterminacy (i.e., uncertainty arising from a lack of knowledge), but are exactly as one would expect when probability intervals are interpreted as representations of ontological indeterminacy (indeterminacy introduced by structural approximations).
Cite
Text
Chrisman. "Independence with Lower and Upper Probabilities." Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1996.Markdown
[Chrisman. "Independence with Lower and Upper Probabilities." Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1996.](https://mlanthology.org/uai/1996/chrisman1996uai-independence/)BibTeX
@inproceedings{chrisman1996uai-independence,
title = {{Independence with Lower and Upper Probabilities}},
author = {Chrisman, Lonnie},
booktitle = {Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence},
year = {1996},
pages = {169-177},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/uai/1996/chrisman1996uai-independence/}
}