Limitations of Skeptical Default Reasoning
Abstract
Poole has shown that nonmonotonic logics do not handle the lottery paradox correctly. In this paper we will show that Pollock's theory of defeasible reasoning fails for the same reason: defeasible reasoning is incompatible with the skeptical notion of derivability.
Cite
Text
Doerpmund. "Limitations of Skeptical Default Reasoning." Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1997.Markdown
[Doerpmund. "Limitations of Skeptical Default Reasoning." Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1997.](https://mlanthology.org/uai/1997/doerpmund1997uai-limitations/)BibTeX
@inproceedings{doerpmund1997uai-limitations,
title = {{Limitations of Skeptical Default Reasoning}},
author = {Doerpmund, Jens},
booktitle = {Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence},
year = {1997},
pages = {150-156},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/uai/1997/doerpmund1997uai-limitations/}
}