Algorithm Portfolio Design: Theory vs. Practice
Abstract
Stochastic algorithms are among the best for solving computationally hard search and reasoning problems. The runtime of such procedures is characterized by a random variable. Different algorithms give rise to different probability distributions. One can take advantage of such differences by combining several algorithms into a portfolio, and running them in parallel or interleaving them on a single processor. We provide a detailed evaluation of the portfolio approach on distributions of hard combinatorial search problems. We show under what conditions the protfolio approach can have a dramatic computational advantage over the best traditional methods.
Cite
Text
Gomes and Selman. "Algorithm Portfolio Design: Theory vs. Practice." Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1997.Markdown
[Gomes and Selman. "Algorithm Portfolio Design: Theory vs. Practice." Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1997.](https://mlanthology.org/uai/1997/gomes1997uai-algorithm/)BibTeX
@inproceedings{gomes1997uai-algorithm,
title = {{Algorithm Portfolio Design: Theory vs. Practice}},
author = {Gomes, Carla P. and Selman, Bart},
booktitle = {Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence},
year = {1997},
pages = {190-197},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/uai/1997/gomes1997uai-algorithm/}
}