Graphical Representations of Consensus Belief
Abstract
Graphical models based on conditional independence support concise encodings of the subjective belief of a single agent. A natural question is whether the consensus belief of a group of agents can be represented with equal parsimony. We prove, under relatively mild assumptions, that even if everyone agrees on a common graph topology, no method of combining beliefs can maintain that structure. Even weaker conditions rule out local aggregation within conditional probability tables. On a more positive note, we show that if probabilities are combined with the logarithmic opinion pool (LogOP), then commonly held Markov independencies are maintained. This suggests a straightforward procedure for constructing a consensus Markov network. We describe an algorithm for computing the LogOP with time complexity comparable to that of exact Bayesian inference.
Cite
Text
Pennock and Wellman. "Graphical Representations of Consensus Belief." Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1999.Markdown
[Pennock and Wellman. "Graphical Representations of Consensus Belief." Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1999.](https://mlanthology.org/uai/1999/pennock1999uai-graphical/)BibTeX
@inproceedings{pennock1999uai-graphical,
title = {{Graphical Representations of Consensus Belief}},
author = {Pennock, David M. and Wellman, Michael P.},
booktitle = {Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence},
year = {1999},
pages = {531-540},
url = {https://mlanthology.org/uai/1999/pennock1999uai-graphical/}
}